Like under the leaves of the great Yggdrasil.
"Anyone who cannot cope with mathematics is not fully human. At best, he is a tolerable subhuman who has learned to wear his shoes, bathe, and not make messes in the house."
— Robert A. Heinlein
Not that I believe in god, but I'd think it's not that he fits in a finite space, or exists on a different plane, but that he IS the space. From what I've read, god is everywhere, if he's infinite, he has to be.
friendship is like peeing your pants, everyone sees it, but only you feel the true warmth
I think that settles that.
I wish Jesus really was in Mexico, then the Mexicans would stop coming to America.
There are lots of guys names Jesus in Mexico.
Yeah, but selling oranges to tourists and being a drug mule don't count as performing miracles.
Unless they're, like, self-peeling oranges with no seeds or pith or that crap between the slices.
Just by defining "God" you're giving "God" limitations. So by "God" even existing within our ability to define or even within an attempt of ours to acknowledge "God"'s exitance, we're already disproving "God"'s "infinite" existance and putting "God" in a more finite plane. Therefore disproving "God" as a whole to most people because you base "God" around being "infinite" or omni-anything. This relates to a strong belief of mine that infinite isn't real nor is it possible at all. Just by giving the concept a name you are limiting it.
Just by defining "God" you're giving "God" limitations.
The only thing we're limiting is the subject that we're talking about.
If we don't give God a name, its impossible to have a meaningful conversation. The parameters of our discussion need to be set and defined before we can have a discussion.
Spikey Dokey: In Russia, when you become the admin of an internet forum, you do it until you die.
Spikey Dokey: Wether you want to or not.
AKA Matt Nada, Original viper, Sariel, Grandleon
I wasn't talking in relation to this conversation, I was talking in relation to religions and etc as a whole. I'm saying that by even being able to conceptualise "God" we are giving the "infinite" limits, therefore rendering the arguement that "God" is "infinite" null and moot.
So by that logic if I say "VaanDiablo is a walking talking banana" that makes you a walking talking banana because by merely stating that you are a walking talking banana I am physically imposing that limitation upon you.
Yes I am able to conceptualize this.
I already have a limitation imposed upon me (more than one, really), but sure why not. Look at this as another matter of perception.
In the words of Eminem; "I am whatever you say I am. If I wasn't then why would you say I am?"
VaanDiablo admits to being an affront to god in a thread about god.
I admit everything and nothing. It's all irrelevant perception-based offel anyway.
What would you know, you're just a walking talking banana.
I'd know as much as a walking talking banana?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)